star doesn't need autoconf213 since star-1.5a74-3 On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:04:19 -0400 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Steve Grubb (sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Monday 12 June 2006 17:48, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > This isn't exhaustive, by any means; there are still quite a few > > > leaf nodes that are potential Extras candidates. > > > > I was wondering why we have autoconf213, automake14, and automake15 > > still in the repo? I was able to eliminate them from my build tree > > 2 years ago. Also, is there any reason to keep byacc? I was able to > > substitute bison for everything that wanted byacc and eliminated it > > from my buildtree too. > > # repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps autoconf213 automake14 > automake15 --archlist i686,i386,noarch,src --repoid development > --repoid development-source mozilla-37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5.src > gtk+-1:1.2.10-50.src star-0:1.5a74-2.src > tetex-0:3.0-24.src > pam_smb-0:1.1.7-7.2.src > emacs-0:21.4-14.1.src > libIDL-0:0.8.6-5.src > metacity-0:2.15.5-5.src > gnome-mag-0:0.12.5-1.src > gtk+-1:1.2.10-50.src > gdm-1:2.15.3-7.src > gnome-session-0:2.15.1-4.src > librsvg2-0:2.15.0-1.src > libwmf-0:0.2.8.4-8.src > nss_db-0:2.2-35.src > > Bill > > -- > Fedora-maintainers mailing list > Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
