seth vidal wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 23:51 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 19:21 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Well, if Fedora is serious about this rule, should not Fedora's rpm be
patched to emit a warning when operating on a dir owned by something
else ?
rpm knows about packages, not repos.
there's a thought that maybe fedora should think about discouraging the
use of rpm as a command get people to use things like repoquery more.
-sv
Formal docs in Fedora(http://fedora.redhat.com/docs) shouldnt be usually
referring to RPM commands at all anymore but there are things like rpm
-ql which are quite useful and dont have a yum equivalent.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
