Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 12:50 -0500, Jeff Spaleta a écrit : > On 1/8/06, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Argh. should be "repoquery -f `rpm -qpl <yourpackage>.rpm`" of course. > > Duh, time to make more coffee... > > I believe that this addition to review policy is the first one which > requires use of repoquery to explore the existing repospace in order > to properly perform the review. The existance of repoquery and how to > use it for this specific review item should probably be added to the > review guidelines page. Well, if Fedora is serious about this rule, should not Fedora's rpm be patched to emit a warning when operating on a dir owned by something else ? This is the only real way conflicts will be caught Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
