On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 19:21 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 12:50 -0500, Jeff Spaleta a écrit : > > On 1/8/06, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Argh. should be "repoquery -f `rpm -qpl <yourpackage>.rpm`" of course. > > > Duh, time to make more coffee... > > > > I believe that this addition to review policy is the first one which > > requires use of repoquery to explore the existing repospace in order > > to properly perform the review. The existance of repoquery and how to > > use it for this specific review item should probably be added to the > > review guidelines page. > > Well, if Fedora is serious about this rule, should not Fedora's rpm be > patched to emit a warning when operating on a dir owned by something > else ? I don't think so, since as has been discussed earlier, exceptions to this rule will be very common (e.g. perl modules). Paul.
