On 1/5/06, Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is a policy that has been enforced for sometime, but never actually > added to the guidelines (until now). Just a thought.... how exactly are we expect as reviewers to check for this? Basically what this says is new package foo shouldn't own a pre-existing package called baz. Doesn't this effectively require a way to check the full package space in Core+Extras to see if a directory is own by a pre-existing package? Not just whatever we happen to have installed on the system we are doing the review on... but all fedora packages regardless of whether they are installed or not. Can this be done with repoquery(which isn't working on rawhide systems at the momment if i recall correctly) I'm not sure this "MUST" can be effectively reviewed or enforced as written, unless repoquery can be used to ask "what other packages in the tree own this directory" -jef
