On 1/8/06, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Argh. should be "repoquery -f `rpm -qpl <yourpackage>.rpm`" of course. > Duh, time to make more coffee... I believe that this addition to review policy is the first one which requires use of repoquery to explore the existing repospace in order to properly perform the review. The existance of repoquery and how to use it for this specific review item should probably be added to the review guidelines page. -jef
