On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 15:14 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 08:33:04 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > > Is it intentional, that redhat-artwork-0.126-1 still references > > > libcairo.so.1? > > > > doubtful... since redhat-artwork according to rpm doesn't have a > > requirement on libcairo this probably fell through the cracks. > > > > Is the autorequires probing that rpm does at buildtime turned off for > > redhat-artwork? > > Want to know what my nose says? It tells me that this smells like > it's disabled, because else the theme DSOs would pull in a lot of > dependencies. Wasn't redhat-artwork a package which wanted Qt and > other libraries even when user used only GNOME? Good nose. It's to avoid Qt and GTK+-1.2 dependencies. Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
