On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 08:33:04 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > Is it intentional, that redhat-artwork-0.126-1 still references > > libcairo.so.1? > > doubtful... since redhat-artwork according to rpm doesn't have a > requirement on libcairo this probably fell through the cracks. > > Is the autorequires probing that rpm does at buildtime turned off for > redhat-artwork? Want to know what my nose says? It tells me that this smells like it's disabled, because else the theme DSOs would pull in a lot of dependencies. Wasn't redhat-artwork a package which wanted Qt and other libraries even when user used only GNOME? Oh,...: $ rpm -q --changelog redhat-artwork |grep -i auto - autoreq 0 to avoid pointless dependencies - automated rebuild
