On 8/20/05, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it intentional, that redhat-artwork-0.126-1 still references > libcairo.so.1? doubtful... since redhat-artwork according to rpm doesn't have a requirement on libcairo this probably fell through the cracks. Is the autorequires probing that rpm does at buildtime turned off for redhat-artwork? -jef
