It depends on the mindframe of the person I think. Originally QA was dealing with a lot of things that no one had time to look at.. and Mike was more of a "tell it to them bluntly" type person. In a larger "find someone in the community to fix it" or "pony up the bennies" style, you should take a more conversational style that gives better explanations of why it isnt being looked at. On 5/28/05, Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen J. Smoogen wrote: > > > > CANTFIX > > > > This is a better answer in some cases to WONTFIX... but leads to even > > more bugzilla choices... (Some anthropologist looking at this in 100 > > years will say "Bugzilla users like eskimos had 200 ways of saying > > CLOSED.) > > > > > > I think it should have been CANTFIX instead of WONTFIX from the > beginning. Are there really cases where CANTFIX doesn't fit a situation > where you mean WONTFIX? > > Warren Togami > wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx > -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
