Re: Draft for Backing up series, part 1: duplicity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the reply Link. Regards the gpg, I had to go through all those
articles you linked to - haha!

Anyway, I really enjoyed reading your work and I'm actually quite envious
of your knowledge and ability to explain quite a lengthy and involved
process.

All the best with the finished piece,

Stuart
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 10:31, Link Dupont <link@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Cool. I like a few of those edits, but it appears I can't edit the
> article anymore after moving it to Pending Review. One of the editors
> will have to pick it up, I suppose.
>
> We can definitely move the gpg --list-keys line to a <pre> block so the
> double-dashes are move obvious.
>
> On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 09:13 +0900, sbrady1215@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hello Link,
> >
> > I checked the first article for readability (I'm sorry but I don't
> > have
> > time to do any more today). I made a few suggestions in the Google
> > Doc
> > below. Please understand these are only suggestions.
> >
> > Oh, and this is a more general thing, are we cool with using Google
> > Docs? TBH it's my go to when I'm editing stuff as Libre is
> > significantly inferior and I couldn't find anything else on Gnome
> > Software.
> >
> > Here is the link:
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UK7V3cgPsl3wvJlZb3ObrKIs8Mwzqspl-
> > QY
> > aW5G9ovg/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Stuart Brady
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 23:07 -0700, Link Dupont wrote:
> > > New preview links (I hope).
> > >
> > > Part 1: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17880&preview=1&_ppp=8de1fb85
> > > 58
> > > Part 2: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17929&preview=1&_ppp=3115e531
> > > ea
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 23:03 -0700, Link Dupont wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 16:13 -0700, Link Dupont wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 21:39 +0000, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> > > > > > On 07/03/2017 11:09 PM, Link Dupont wrote:
> > > > > > > Perfect feedback. I'll give that a pass. Do you think
> > > > > > > there's
> > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > time spent on setting up AWS? I was thinking about a slight
> > > > > > > restructuring of the article to focus more on duplicity,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > leave
> > > > > > > most
> > > > > > > of the AWS stuff up to the user. Basically writing the
> > > > > > > article
> > > > > > > assuming
> > > > > > > that the user has their AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and
> > > > > > > AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY
> > > > > > > already and just telling them to plug them in.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey Link,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This came up during the meeting today. We remembered that you
> > > > > > wanted
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > wait until all three articles in the series were complete
> > > > > > before
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > published them. However, in the release upgrade article…
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17971&preview=1&_ppp=0dcd79
> > > > > > e6
> > > > > > 7b
> > > > > >
> > > > > > …we briefly mention about taking backups, and point to a
> > > > > > PkgDB
> > > > > > link
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > deja-dup. What do you think about publishing the first one on
> > > > > > Monday,
> > > > > > and then cross-linking this in the upgrade instruction
> > > > > > article?
> > > > > > This
> > > > > > might help give the series a long shelf-life since the
> > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > article
> > > > > > gets a lot of traffic for a couple months after an upgrade
> > > > > > (so
> > > > > > ideally,
> > > > > > people might discover the whole backup series by looking up
> > > > > > instructions
> > > > > > on how to upgrade).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, we wanted to check with you if you want to do this
> > > > > > first.
> > > > > > We
> > > > > > could always go back later and edit the link to your series
> > > > > > once
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > drafts are up. What do you think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > g
> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedorapr
> > > > > > oj
> > > > > > ec
> > > > > > t.
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > g
> > > > >
> > > > > Echoing what I said in #fedora-magazine. It looks like part 3
> > > > > (deja-
> > > > > dup) *won't* build (technically) on top of part 1 (duplicity)
> > > > > like
> > > > > I
> > > > > originally thought. Part 2 (duply) can definitely build on top
> > > > > of
> > > > > part
> > > > > 1 though. So I'd like to have part 1 and 2 finalized before
> > > > > publishing
> > > > > so that the full backup created in part 1 is detected by duply
> > > > > in
> > > > > part
> > > > > 2.
> > > > >
> > > > > Both articles do exist in draft form. I'm currently editing the
> > > > > commands in part 2 to make sure the output is correct, and the
> > > > > duply
> > > > > profile detects the full backup created with duplicity. Both
> > > > > articles
> > > > > are mostly complete. Once I've given them another pass over to
> > > > > make
> > > > > sure the commands are correct, they'll still need an editorial
> > > > > review.
> > > > > If someone can possibly edit them over the weekend, then we
> > > > > could
> > > > > probably publish part 1 on Monday.
> > > > >
> > > > > They both articles also will need feature images. I had hoped
> > > > > to
> > > > > try
> > > > > one on my own, but maybe Ryan should crank out one for Part 1
> > > > > so
> > > > > it's
> > > > > ready for publishing on Monday.
> > > > >
> > > > > ~link
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > g
> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproj
> > > > > ec
> > > > > t.
> > > > > or
> > > > > g
> > > >
> > > > I finished up Part 1 and Part 2. I'd greatly appreciate an
> > > > editorial
> > > > eye; I made a number of changes late tonight, and I know my error
> > > > count
> > > > goes up significantly the later in the evening I write.
> > > >
> > > > Also I'd like it if someone could follow the steps to make sure I
> > > > didn't make any assumptions about software on my system.
> > > >
> > > > ~link
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraprojec
> > > > t.
> > > > or
> > > > g
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.
> > > or
> > > g_______________________________________________
> Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux