On 07/05/2010 06:25 AM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Hi, > > Need clarification on the License to be used for nesC [1] spec file: > > The compiler is provided under GPLv2. But, the Java classes that > provide support for reading nesC's XML output are Copyright (c) > 2004-2006 Intel Corporation. These were released under the Intel Open > Source License (now deprecated) [2]. In the latest CVS tree, it has > been updated: > > http://nescc.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nescc/nesc/COPYRIGHT?revision=1.3&view=markup > > 22 The Java classes that provide support for reading nesC's XML output are > 23 Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Intel Corporation > 24 > 25 These files are provided under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or > 26 redistributing these files, you may do so under either license. > 27 > > So, should I use "GPLv2 and GPLv2/BSD" in the License section of the .spec file? This would be the most correct License tag: License: GPLv2 and (GPLv2 or BSD) ~spot _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
