Hi, Need clarification on the License to be used for nesC [1] spec file: The compiler is provided under GPLv2. But, the Java classes that provide support for reading nesC's XML output are Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Intel Corporation. These were released under the Intel Open Source License (now deprecated) [2]. In the latest CVS tree, it has been updated: http://nescc.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nescc/nesc/COPYRIGHT?revision=1.3&view=markup 22 The Java classes that provide support for reading nesC's XML output are 23 Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Intel Corporation 24 25 These files are provided under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or 26 redistributing these files, you may do so under either license. 27 So, should I use "GPLv2 and GPLv2/BSD" in the License section of the .spec file? Appreciate your inputs, Thanks! SK [1] nesC. http://nescc.sourceforge.net/ [2] Bad licenses. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
