On 03/21/2010 07:49 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I note that iozone was removed from Fedora back in the F-9 days due to > license issues, but it's still being shipped by EPEL. > > I'm not sure if this is an oversight, or if EPEL somehow gets a pass on > this, or if the situation is more complex. Our procedure of killing a > package in devel and letting it age out of Fedora doesn't really work > for EPEL, it seems. This needs to be killed in EPEL as well. We should make sure it doesn't end up in future repodata, as painful as that is. ~spot _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
