On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 21:31 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi. > > SciLab has changed its licence to CeCILLv2[1], which claims to be GPLv2+ > compatible. I tried reading it and it gave me a headache. It seems > to contain a few dubious passages[2]. Could RH Legal have a look at it > and decide if it's OK to include code licensed under it in Fedora? Yep, they're all fine, they were in the Licensing list already: CeCILL License v2 is Free and GPL compatible. (License: CeCILL) CeCILL-B License is Free but GPL-incompatible (License: CeCILL-B) CeCILL-C License is Free but GPL-incompatible (License: CeCILL-C) I'll worry about v1 if something actually uses it. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
