On Thursday, 09 October 2008 at 22:01, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 21:31 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hi. > > > > SciLab has changed its licence to CeCILLv2[1], which claims to be GPLv2+ > > compatible. I tried reading it and it gave me a headache. It seems > > to contain a few dubious passages[2]. Could RH Legal have a look at it > > and decide if it's OK to include code licensed under it in Fedora? > > Yep, they're all fine, they were in the Licensing list already: > > CeCILL License v2 is Free and GPL compatible. (License: CeCILL) > CeCILL-B License is Free but GPL-incompatible (License: CeCILL-B) > CeCILL-C License is Free but GPL-incompatible (License: CeCILL-C) > > I'll worry about v1 if something actually uses it. Thanks and sorry for bothering you. I didn't think to check the Licensing list, because someone mentioned this to me as a new occurence (SciLab's licence change, that is). Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list