>>>>> "DM" == Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: DM> Hi. SciLab has changed its licence to CeCILLv2[1], which claims to DM> be GPLv2+ compatible. I tried reading it and it gave me a DM> headache. It seems to contain a few dubious passages[2]. Could RH DM> Legal have a look at it and decide if it's OK to include code DM> licensed under it in Fedora? Well, CeCILLv2 is already on the license list as acceptable. DM> Ideally, I'd like to have an answer for all four licences listed DM> on this page, but CeCILLv2 would suffice for now. There are three CeCILL licenses listed currently; which one is missing? - J< _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
