Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/12/06, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> like Plesk. Yes, you're reading that right: Plesk is still supported
> on FC1. They don't tell you that FC1 itself has been EOL for some
> time now. Note that Plesk is not particularly unique in this...

Totally. This is why I'm surprised that there's not been more interest in
Legacy.

But not too surprised -- most people don't really care about keeping their
systems secure.


The biggest problem is that 99 out of a 100 people have no idea about
their computer than they do about their car. If you read the car
manual, you should probably check the oil and tire air pressure at
least once a week, etc etc. But the majority of people might never
check it beyond making sure that they take the car into the shop when
the light goes yellow.

They want the same from their computer systems and servers. The
computer is to get them from point A to point B, get the morning mail,
play some games, put up pictures of the family dog. The idea that they
have to check the oil daily is foreign and basically gets put into the
back corner because the computer is supposed to be like a TV set,
radio, or car.

--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux