Let's not forget that we have a new way of marking bugs as security issues. There is no longer a severity of "Security," but now "Security" is one of the Bugzila Keywords (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/describekeywords.cgi). -David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project" <fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:31 PM Subject: Re: Fedora Core 4 coming . . . sunset,infrastructure issues . . . meeting? > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:54:57PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > Anyone have any opinion on this? > > I would think be clear that we're interested only in security related bugs. > > Yeah. Last time I actually went through the open security bugs and moved > them to Legacy myself where appropriate; I'll probably do that again. I'll > also look closely at those marked critical. The rest got this message: > > Fedora Core 2 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security > updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and > reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and > hasn't been resolved in the current FC3 updates or in the FC4 test > release, reopen and change the version to match. > > Which I'd plan to do again, with of course FC2 -> FC3/4, FC3 -> FC5, and FC4 > test -> FC6 test. > > As before, I'll add myself to the CC list of each bug and help deal with > anything that is stirred up, as of course the intent is cleanup, not more > mess. > > > -- > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list > -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
