On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 10:08 -0700, Tim Thome wrote: > My last words on the subject... > > The RH9 GA Release, as far as I can tell, was 03/31/03. Putting RH's > timeline for life-cycle, maintenance should be carried on for a > minimum of 5 years. > > I think this is probably unreasonable, as the team's resources are > limited, which is why we're having this discussion. > > However, as Eric wrote, there are complex production systems that are > running RH9, and the pain of upgrading these to the 2.6 kernel, these > systems may not be able to make that leap. This bar is going to be > hit with other distro's as well, including the RHEL clones. > > The only alternative for RH9 users is to migrate outside of the > direct RH family, and this is bad karma for us... No it's not. migrate to centos 3. it's a 2.4 kernel, it's a rebuild project, it follows rhel3 completely and is damned-near perfect for leaving rhl9 AND it is free. -sv -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
