Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Jun 10, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Lawrence 'The Dreamer' Chen wrote:
Well, I was thinking that when I get settled after my upcoming
relocation and my new job, that I wanted to see about building
another machine (because I plan to replace my W2K server) so I can
help with continuing support of RH73.
Yes, my RH73 is also probably not quite stock...anymore....though
the upgrade from RH72 to RH73 wasn't really that long ago. But, I
don't know about the worry about hardware failure. Over the years
I've experienced failures...but the machine continues to run fine.
I'm on my 3rd root disk for the machine, the last I lost due to a
power outage just a few months ago.
Is there a reason why you would go with RH 7.3 instead of RHEL or
something similar? Why would you setup a machine with an OS that is
already unsupported?
And being on your 3rd root disk, for the same machine, sounds a lot like
hardware failure to me... and something to be worried about. ;-)
I take it you are just a home user of RH73, not someone who supports an
organization or company of RH73 systems, right?
-Jim P.
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
