On Jun 10, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Lawrence 'The Dreamer' Chen wrote:
Well, I was thinking that when I get settled after my upcoming
relocation and
my new job, that I wanted to see about building another machine
(because I plan
to replace my W2K server) so I can help with continuing support of
RH73.
Yes, my RH73 is also probably not quite stock...anymore....though
the upgrade
from RH72 to RH73 wasn't really that long ago. But, I don't know
about the
worry about hardware failure. Over the years I've experienced
failures...but
the machine continues to run fine. I'm on my 3rd root disk for the
machine,
the last I lost due to a power outage just a few months ago.
Is there a reason why you would go with RH 7.3 instead of RHEL or
something similar? Why would you setup a machine with an OS that is
already unsupported?
-Jeff
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
