Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Then the Legacy Project has removed my ability not to subscribe
to "testing".


No, the Legacy Project has _proposed_ to that, at least in your opinion.
It was followed by something like "unless we get a lot of objection" so
please, if you object, let it be known.

I did object, and then I saw that the decision was *made*.

Since Legacy is no longer in my yum configuration, it's no longer
an issue for me, good or bad.


Yes, we lose a few people from the community every time this issue comes
up.  I guess the hope is we will gain more if we release more, but I'm not
sure it is true (hasn't been so far, as far as I can tell).

You didn't "lose" me because the issue came up, you "lost" me
because /a decision was made/.

I don't wish to subscribe to "testing".
Since "testing" and "release" have been merged, I have unsubscribed
from "release".

No, it was proposed that we merge them, but it is still under consideration,
and can still be blocked.  Your action is a bit premature.  But then,
considering some of the responses you have received in e-mail (like having
to pay to be notified) I don't blame you too much.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux