Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Then the Legacy Project has removed my ability not to subscribe
to "testing".
No, the Legacy Project has _proposed_ to that, at least in your opinion.
It was followed by something like "unless we get a lot of objection" so
please, if you object, let it be known.
I did object, and then I saw that the decision was *made*.
Since Legacy is no longer in my yum configuration, it's no longer
an issue for me, good or bad.
Yes, we lose a few people from the community every time this issue comes
up. I guess the hope is we will gain more if we release more, but I'm not
sure it is true (hasn't been so far, as far as I can tell).
You didn't "lose" me because the issue came up, you "lost" me
because /a decision was made/.
I don't wish to subscribe to "testing".
Since "testing" and "release" have been merged, I have unsubscribed
from "release".
No, it was proposed that we merge them, but it is still under
consideration,
and can still be blocked. Your action is a bit premature. But then,
considering some of the responses you have received in e-mail (like having
to pay to be notified) I don't blame you too much.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list