Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:

Then the Legacy Project has removed my ability not to subscribe
to "testing".


Seems to be a misunderstanding here. There are separate repositories for testing and general legacy updates. Yes?

AIUI, there will be objects put into "testing". These then will be
automatically moved to "rlease" state after either some QA takes
place, or some time lapses, whichever comes first. IMO, this is
tantamount to merging "test" and "release" states.

Always willing to be corrected if I have misunderstood the
proposal.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux