Re: Fwd: Re: releasing updates-testing packages without VERIFY votes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--On Friday, September 23, 2005 2:13 PM -0500 Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As far as I can see, the sole reason for existence of the Fedora
Legacy is stability. If I were willing to forego the stability,
I'd upgrade to FC4 right now, today. I'm not willing to do that,
so I came to Legacy.

I have 3 FC2 servers I'd love to put FC4 on but am blocked for various reasons, none really "stability", at least for packages not required to boot the system.

One is colo'd, and I'm uncomfortable to do an upgrade of that scope without physical access.

One has old hardware (MegaRAID IDE) and I need to first get a working kernel (in progress, need to build a test boot CD) before I can update.

The last is waiting for adequate downtime to effect the upgrade. (I'll be copying the drive, then upgrading with the copy.)

For all of these servers I update piecemeal, often from Rawhide SRPM's to get something close to the upstream stable release. For some packages with good SRPM's upstream, I'll go straight to those. (I just did that for SpamAssassin.)

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux