Quoting Jim Popovitch <jimpop@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 07:34 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > > OK, almost a week has passed since the last message on this thread. I > > think we need to decide what to do. > > > > Specific suggestions? > > How about 2 Verifies for core/server packages and 1 Verify for > everything else? Who decides what a core/server package is, and what isn't? Also, if the packager/creator is the only voter, do we really have any QA at all if only one vote is needed? > Also, only 1 Verify would be needed for a core/server > package that is being re-released within a 3 month period. Hmm... Interesting twist. Not sure I'd agree with it though. Maybe if you want to say "a re-release to fix a bug in a previous FL release" (which happens). > -Jim P. -- Eric Rostetter -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
