Re: changes are needed, we need keep moving

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Tom Yates <madlists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> i'd still prefer that we released fixes for each OS as they passed the
> verify bar, instead of waiting until all affected OSes have been QA'ed
> before releasing any fix; that way, we don't release untested code, but
> unpopular distros can't hold the popular ones to ransom.

That is much more reasonable than releasing packages without proper QA.
 
> but if that's unacceptable to the project as a whole, then pekka, your
> proposal seems sensible to me.  two weeks seems like a good time.

Your proposal is much better than releasing packages without proper QA.
That is to say, your proposal is much more likely to be acceptable than
Pekka's.

-- 
Eric Rostetter

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux