On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 22:16 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Eric Rostetter wrote: > >> Something needs to > >> start happening. Ideas? > > > > People who have an interest in having packages released need to start > > doing QA (and/or other work for the group). > > We've been calling out for that for months, but that has typically > resulted in minor surges only, nothing major enough to go on with. A LOT of that is because there are a LOT of packages waiting for testing that people just plainly don't have interest in. Looking at http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html, I see 95% of cruft that makes it difficult to focus on the 4 or 5% that I care about. Do we really need to be releasing a mozilla for rh73? Additionally, take the pending/not-pending kernel that is held up. Look at it's bugzilla report and then let me know what it's waiting on. (do this without beating your head against a wall, taking aspirin, or other drugs). The process isn't broke, the process just sadly isn't easy to be involved with. Some things on http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html are also not apparently correct (or maybe bugzilla is incorrect). Take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152827 for instance. Is it just a RH9 problem? what about this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152792 is it only RH9 too? Here's my predicament: I can test RH73 packages used in a "locked-down" server environment. So, what do I need to test? -Jim P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
