On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:31:11PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html, I see 95% of cruft that > makes it difficult to focus on the 4 or 5% that I care about. Do we > really need to be releasing a mozilla for rh73? Yes, if we consider rh73 supported at all. There's important remote security flaws in the older version. > The process isn't broke, the process just sadly isn't easy to be > involved with. Arguably, that's broke. :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 79 degrees Fahrenheit. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
