On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Jim Popovitch wrote:
The process isn't broke, the process just sadly isn't easy to be
involved with.
Some things on http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html are also
not apparently correct (or maybe bugzilla is incorrect). Take this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152827 for
instance. Is it just a RH9 problem? what about this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152792 is it only
RH9 too?
This is a feature :). You're looking at a wrong place.
Note that the script only does RHL73-speficic listing for PUBLISH and
VERIFY stages, because there's no guarantee that the rest are
properly classified.
For most QA purposes (unless you want to build packages and a little
bit of something else), looking at PUBLISH and VERIFY only should be
sufficient.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
