On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 11:47, Eric Rostetter wrote: > I guess then unless someone volunteers to be the main 7.2 or 8.0 packager, > we have no choice but to kill them. We can't ask Jesse to do this in > addition to all the other stuff he does. > > I'll gladly QA test 7.2 and 8.0 stuff, but I don't have the time to do the > packages. If no one else steps up asap to take on one of these, then I > guess they should be dropped. If people are still using 8.0, I guess I could step up and do the packages. A few people would have to do the QA though, as I don't have any 8.0 machine in production anymore. I was looking into contributing to FL, so that could be it. BUT, if everyone can upgrade to a newer version, my time could be better spent doing RHL9 packages, and FC1 in a few months. I think 7.2 should be dropped as the upgrade to 7.3 is easy. There is also another alternative: support 7.2 and 8.0 only for priority 1 security bugs. For example: a remote http compromise. This would mean only a package here and there instead of having one for every local thing that comes out. Marc. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
