Warren Togami wrote: > Most of the businesses involved with Fedora Legacy seem ONLY interested > in security patches to existing distributions and NOT add-ons, am I > right?
That's an emphatic YES from me. The Legacy Project won't have the manpower to go around adding in new features to old distros. Security patches will take enough work as it is, I think.
I would further suggest our policy include two additional clarifications:
* If we must fix bugs which are not security-related, fix the high priority
items that cause work stoppage, data loss, etc. Don't fix unimportant
bugs (simple cosmetic items, rarely used features, etc). Let those be
fixed in newer Fedora releases.
* Don't add new features no matter how popular they are, unless they are
necessary to resolve security or high-priority functionality bugs.My idea is that once things are handed over to the Legacy Project, they should be considered more or less "frozen". It's not that I want to lock out Legacy users from newer features, it's just that I believe these releases should be looked upon as "stable" and not mucked with unnecessarily. I doubt the Project will have a lot of extra QA resources, so we'd need to concentrate them where they can do the most good for the least effort.
David -- David J. Bianco, GSEC GCUX GCIH <bianco@xxxxxxxx> Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility GPG Fingerprint: 516A B80D AAB3 1617 A340 227A 723B BFBE B395 33BA
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and not those of SURA/Jefferson Lab or the US DOE.
