rhel or fedora (we haven't decided yet)
Does anybody knows if it's legally possible to rebuild RHEL from the SRPMS provided by RH on their ftp site and
then distribute this new binary version.
Lucas Albers wrote:
Yup. I have systems that work, and I just need security erratta. New systems are going to be running newer redhat or fedora, I'm not interesetd in installing new instances of redhat 7.3, only supporting my existing ones. Like the man said, we just want to keep critical systems working, while we determine how to upgrade them. --LukeThis one time, at band camp, Warren Togami <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Most of the businesses involved with Fedora Legacy seem ONLY interested in security patches to existing distributions and NOT add-ons, am I right?I think this is so. I think anyone wanting add-ons at this time in the game would do well to update RHEL where there is more support available. kevin -- ______ (_____ \ _____) ) ____ ____ ____ ____ | ____/ / _ ) / _ | / ___) / _ ) | | ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ / |_| \____) \_||_| \____) \____) Kevin Waterson Port Macquarie, Australia _______________________________________________ Fedora-legacy-list mailing list Fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list_______________________________________________ Fedora-legacy-list mailing list Fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list .
-- Franco Bladilo Linux Cluster Administrator Distributed Systems and LAN Management Rice University bladilo@xxxxxxxx
