> My idea is that once things are handed over to the Legacy Project, they > should be considered more or less "frozen". It's not that I want to > lock out Legacy users from newer features, it's just that I believe > these releases should be looked upon as "stable" and not mucked with > unnecessarily. I doubt the Project will have a lot of extra QA > resources, so we'd need to concentrate them where they can do the most > good for the least effort. I would echo that sentiment, both from a resources and stability point of view. I think we're asking for trouble if we expect that it's "not a big deal" to add a feature here and there. -Chuck -- Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology * Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=- * Integration | http://www.quantumlinux.com * Support | chuckw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
