"David J. Bianco" wrote: > My idea is that once things are handed over to the Legacy Project, > they should be considered more or less "frozen". It's not that I > want to lock out Legacy users from newer features, it's just that I > believe these releases should be looked upon as "stable" and not > mucked with unnecessarily. I agree wholeheartedly! If it doesn't need to be fixed, don't touch it. If I really need additional software or new features, that's my problem, and I'll deal with it. But the "official" updates should be kept to the absolutely necessary minium - I need to validate every change to the systems. Best regards, Martin Stricker -- Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/ Linux Migration Project: http://www.linux-migration.org/ Red Hat Linux 9 for low memory: http://www.rule-project.org/ Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
