Re: [PATCH 0/3] pre-generated initrd and unified kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 9:54 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/25/22 11:40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Hi! The following is all nitpicking. I hope it won't cause a
> > bikeshedding discussion, I'm not going to fight for any of this, I just
> > want to get it of my chest.
>
> Sorry, I do have somewhat of a bikeshed suggestion:
>
> > On 25.11.22 11:09, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>>> So how about splitting 'kernel-core' into a modules and a kernel binary
> >>>> package?  Like this:
> >>>>
> >>>>   kernel-modules-core     - the modules from current 'kernel-core'
> >>>>   kernel-modules-standard - current 'kernel-modules' renamed (maybe
> >>>>                             skip rename, but I think it'll be less
> >>>>                             confusing that way).
> >>>>   kernel-modules-{extra,internal} - no changes
> >
> > I always found "internal" confusing, because it makes my head go
> > "internal to what? The Kernel?". Hence while we're reshuffling this, why
> > not make it more obvious what this package contains and call it
> > something like "kernel-modules-testing" or something like that?
>
> I agree that internal is confusing. But testing reminds me of
> updates-testing, so I find -testing this somewhat confusing too.
>
> Usually packaged test programs are called just tests, so maybe we can
> go with: "kernel-modules-tests" or "kernel-modules-selftests" ?

The "internal" bit is a leftover RHELism, and it is internal as in not
shipped.  Obviously this does not translate well to Fedora as we do
ship them. While I am fine with a rename, I am not sure what amount of
effort is actually required there because tooling is in place to
ensure that the package doesn't get included or shipped for RHEL
customers.

Justin

> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux