On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:07:38PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 11:21:03AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > Thus my patch proposed two images, to be distributed in the same > > > 'kernel-virt-unified' sub-RPM. > > > > > > * vmlinuz-virt.efi created using dracut arg > > > > > > --kernel-cmdline 'console=ttyS0 console=tty0 quiet rhgb' > > > > > > * vmlinuz-virt-verbose.efi created using dracut arg > > > > > > --kernel-cmdline 'console=ttyS0 console=tty0' > > > > Hmm, I think we should look for a more elegant solution to this problem > > than having two large, 99% identical images. > > > > One option could be to have systemd-stub support multiple .cmdline > > sections and allowing the user to pick one of them. > > > > Another option could be to have a whitelist of options the user is > > allowed to add/remove which then could include stuff like 'console=' > > and 'quiet'. > > FYI, I filed an RFE with systemd to get their opinion on the idea > of alternative cmdline entries, and/or validated option lists: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/24539 So, how move forward with this best? Drop the verbose variant for now, add support for that once systemd-stub support for multiple command lines is sorted upstream? Should we have a Fedora feature page for unified kernel support? take care, Gerd _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
