On 26.11.22 16:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 11/25/22 11:40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Hi! The following is all nitpicking. I hope it won't cause a
>> bikeshedding discussion, I'm not going to fight for any of this, I just
>> want to get it of my chest.
> Sorry, I do have somewhat of a bikeshed suggestion:
:-D
>> On 25.11.22 11:09, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>>> kernel-modules-{extra,internal} - no changes
>> I always found "internal" confusing, because it makes my head go
>> "internal to what? The Kernel?". Hence while we're reshuffling this, why
>> not make it more obvious what this package contains and call it
>> something like "kernel-modules-testing" or something like that?
>
> I agree that internal is confusing. But testing reminds me of
> updates-testing, so I find -testing this somewhat confusing too.
>
> Usually packaged test programs are called just tests, so maybe we can
> go with: "kernel-modules-tests" or "kernel-modules-selftests" ?
Yeah, both are better than my suggestion.
Ciao, Thorsten
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
