Re: kernel man pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 06/05/2014 08:27 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06/05/2014 05:38 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 06/05/2014 07:02 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:05:50PM +0430, navid Rahimi wrote:
>>>>>> is there any man page for kernel in fedora ?? in debian
>>>>>
>>>>> No.  The kernel-doc package contained the html equivalent of the man
>>>>> pages, but I don't believe we ever shipped the man9 pages themselves.
>>>>
>>>> Actually F19 still has man9, and you're the one who dropped it in F20:
>>>>
>>>>     commit d3cca19fc2a55e3588284626e24e7f7e8c1effd1
>>>>     Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>     Date:   Tue Aug 6 16:52:31 2013 -0400
>>>>
>>>>         Don't package API man pages in -doc (rhbz 993905)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993905
>>>
>>> Oh, indeed you are correct.  Apparently I forgot that.
>>>
>>> In any case, Fedora doesn't plan on shipping the kernel docs any longer.
>>
>> May I ask why not? As a kernel developer I found them very useful. I'll gladly
>> admit that they should probably be in a separate sub-package, not -doc itself,
>> although if you're dropping that altogether then it does not matter.
>>
>> Not having them at all is quite inconvenient, and I quite often find myself
>> missing them ...  Maybe drop the html docs, and re-introduce the man pages?
> 
> 1) The Base OS group is pushing to reduce build requires for the Base
> packages as much as possible.  Just building the documentation that,
> to be quite honest, very few people ever read required crazy things to
> be dragged into the buildroot.
> 
> 2) The way they were handled in the kernel.spec is terrible and
> required a special koji hack that nothing else needs.
> 
> If someone wants to add a completely separate kernel-doc or
> kernel-manpage package then I'm all for it.  I'll even be happy to
> review it.  However, I'm not adding it back as a subpackage to
> kernel.spec.


Ok fair enough.

I'm afraid I don't have the time to create a kernel-manpages packages,
but since I'm interested in seeing one, I too am willing to review it :)


Regards,

Hans
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux