On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:40:33 -0300 "Gerald B. Cox" <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Christian Dersch <lupinix@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > I know many use Firefox and are also power users of this browser. My > > intention is to bring new users a well integrated experience of > > Plasma and for most users QupZilla will be fine. > > > > I thought we had already crossed the rubicon on that - meaning that > specifically for a web browser, functionality and usability are part > of the equation also, and they can collectively outweigh the perceived > benefits of an integrated experience. > > Firefox is in the process of a major revamp where they are going to > have a multi-process architecture and support Chrome extensions. with what impacts on functionality and usability? > Chromium is currently under package review in Fedora. QupZilla does > not currently support Chrome extensions, and from their FAQ it's not > on their roadmap. > Maybe they will change their mind, maybe they won't. In any event, we > should probably wait to see the results of the above before > addressing this again. -- Reporter to Mahatma Ghandi after his tour of east London "What do you think of western civilization, Mr. Ghandi?" Ghandi - "I think it would be an excellent idea!" _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
