On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Mustafa Muhammad <mustafa1024m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote:On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Mustafa Muhammad <mustafa1024m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:We can provide a better user experience for Fedora KDE users, but you refuse to make it happen because you hate Mozilla and want to support upstream KDE.Shipping inferior browser is hurting Fedora KDE, and hurting upstream KDE in general.
You're missing the point here. KDE is a desktop environment; they have set their own defaults. Fedora is a linux distribution which packages KDE. When you choose toinstall the KDE environment, you should expect to get the upstream defaults. I would be a bit annoyed if that were not the case.If you have an issue with the performance or capabilities of a KDE application, you should report that upstream.If you don't like certain default KDE applications, it is extremely easy to use something else. I use chrome, copyq, qmmp and aria2. It's extremely easy...Any user familiar with Fedora can do:dnf erase -y firefoxBut new users should have a familiar environment on the live session, and the best UX possible using KDE, I only use KDE as a DE, but some KDE apps are simply not competitive.
I meant Plasme :)
Mustafa
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
