Anne Wilson wrote:
> I really can't see what the big deal is. All we're asking is that you
> make sure it has a differentiated name - something like kde-pmTP would do
> it - so that we don't get it as an update, but as a deliberate choice.
> What's wrong with that request? And if you planned to do it anyway, why
> can't you say so instead of mocking genuine concerns, as several people
> seem to think is the way to reply
We don't have any plans to rename the kdepim 4.5 packages at this time and
it'd be a source of problems (the packages would have to Conflict,
translations would be an issue etc.) and additional work.
The plan instead is to ship one version of kdepim per repository. For
Rawhide and kde-redhat unstable, this is 4.5, which is now in beta stage.
Kevin Kofler
