2010/7/4 Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com>: > On Sunday 04 July 2010 13:19:13 Eike Hein wrote: >> Keeping the kdepim 4.5 beta out of kde-unstable would create a dange- >> rous precedent for the future by hampering what kde-unstable has up >> until now been used for, and thus limiting its usefulness for pre- >> release testing, and thus limiting testing. > > I really can't see what the big deal is. ?All we're asking is that you make > sure it has a differentiated name - something like kde-pmTP would do it - so > that we don't get it as an update, but as a deliberate choice. ?What's wrong > with that request? ?And if you planned to do it anyway, why can't you say so > instead of mocking genuine concerns, as several people seem to think is the > way to reply Why kdepimTP? If one don't want to test kdepim4.5 on a testmachine as you stated some people have, why have it installed along with kdepim4.4? If one is afraid of kdepim4.5, what is so hard to use: yum --exclude=kdepim update? And if i'm willing to test, i want to test everything, including the update from 4.4 to 4.5. That's part of testing. This whole thread gets slowly ridiculous. Test it or leave it. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium
