On Sunday 04 July 2010 13:19:13 Eike Hein wrote: > Keeping the kdepim 4.5 beta out of kde-unstable would create a dange- > rous precedent for the future by hampering what kde-unstable has up > until now been used for, and thus limiting its usefulness for pre- > release testing, and thus limiting testing. I really can't see what the big deal is. All we're asking is that you make sure it has a differentiated name - something like kde-pmTP would do it - so that we don't get it as an update, but as a deliberate choice. What's wrong with that request? And if you planned to do it anyway, why can't you say so instead of mocking genuine concerns, as several people seem to think is the way to reply Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100704/ee61a00a/attachment.bin
