On 7/4/2010 10:22 PM, Eli Wapniarski wrote: > I give up. Do what you want. My feeling is its a mistake. I think it would be a mistake not to. I'd rather kdepim is a rough ride in kde-unstable than in a stable release, and testing it early enough is what the KDE SIG and Fedora KDE can do to make sure that doesn't happen. I understand and appreciate that you feel that putting a hypothetical broken kdepim into kde-unstable would be harmful. But if this kdepim is broken, that's something we actually have to find out! And that's what kde-unsta- ble is for, too. I tried to talk earlier about how in my mind it would end up being *more* harmful to give up on kde-unstable as the place we can use for this (like we have done so far) and instead turn it into the "bleeding edge, but nothing too upsetting" repo. That's really a downward spiral in how it removes pressure from packagers to work toward integrating stuff into the main repo. I've really seen that happen at many other distros and it's a mess and takes a toll on overall package quality. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. > Eli -- Best regards, Eike Hein
