On 02/25/2010 05:13 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Linuxguy123<linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:09 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote: >> >>>>> >>>>> The 64bit flash without nspluginwrapper is more resource friendly here. >>>>> >>>>>> video is nvidia proprietary (rpmfusion). >>>>> >>>>> Well, that's a problem. >>>> >>>> We've seen various people on this list blame the proprietary nvidia >>>> driver for various problems before and it hasn't turned out to be the >>>> issue. What proof do you have ? >>> >>> And we had enough flame posts about it on the different fedora-* lists >>> Not going to have another one. >>> I think you know the problems of a closed source driver. If not, it is >>> not supported by us. >> >> Could you please smear the closed source driver a bit more ? Just >> because its closed source doesn't mean its bad. >> >> So what if its not supported by "us". Maybe the problem isn't in the >> closed source driver. Maybe its in a, gulp, Fedora component ! Have >> you even looked ? > > What's the real problem? You think you have to fight something > personal with me? Then simply tell me what. > > Closed source drivers aren't supported by us == Fedora. It counts for > any closed source software. > If you think that isn't right, go on and change it. > I think what he is saying is that not every bug found by a user running the Nvidia proprietary driver is necessarily an Nvidia bug.