On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Linuxguy123 <linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:09 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote: > >> >> >> >> The 64bit flash without nspluginwrapper is more resource friendly here. >> >> >> >> > video is nvidia proprietary (rpmfusion). >> >> >> >> Well, that's a problem. >> > >> > We've seen various people on this list blame the proprietary nvidia >> > driver for various problems before and it hasn't turned out to be the >> > issue. ?What proof do you have ? >> >> And we had enough flame posts about it on the different fedora-* lists >> ?Not going to have another one. >> I think you know the problems of a closed source driver. If not, it is >> not supported by us. > > Could you please smear the closed source driver a bit more ? ?Just > because its closed source doesn't mean its bad. > > So what if its not supported by "us". ?Maybe the problem isn't in the > closed source driver. ?Maybe its in a, gulp, ?Fedora component ! ?Have > you even looked ? What's the real problem? You think you have to fight something personal with me? Then simply tell me what. Closed source drivers aren't supported by us == Fedora. It counts for any closed source software. If you think that isn't right, go on and change it. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium
