On Tuesday 16 June 2009 12:18:50 Eelko Berkenpies wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:07:56 +0300, Eli Wapniarski > <eli at orbsky.homelinux.org> wrote: > > On Monday 15 June 2009 15:09:10 Eelko Berkenpies wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:48:14 -0400, Ben Boeckel <MathStuf at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> > Hash: SHA1 > >> > > >> > Eelko Berkenpies wrote: > >> > > >> >> There is being worked on one; http://rekonq.sourceforge.net/ > >> >> > >> >> I don't know if it will be a default browser but it makes an > >> > good > >> >> alternative for Konqueror anyway. :) > >> >> > >> >> I'm working on getting it properly packaged for Fedora. I got > >> > an older > >> >> package wrapped up here: http://berkenpies.nl/rekonq/ (spec > >> > needs work for > >> >> the new version, 0.1.0, and I have to make sure I got > >> > everything covered > >> >> for review). The plan is to get it in to review before the > >> > end of next > >> >> week. > >> > We'll see how it goes. I'm not holding by breath for these > >> > Konqueror replacements. The project making the KPart to get > >> > WebKit integration is the one that, IMO, is Doing It Right > >> > instead of making a new browser from scratch. > >> > > >> > - --Ben > >> > >> Alright, I managed to wrap things up (a bit later as expected though). > >> But > >> hey, better late then never they say. :) > >> > >> I've packaged rekonq 0.1.0 for F11 and F12/rawhide. It should pretty > much > >> comply with the Package Guidelines and I'll submit it for review later. > >> Although I'd appreciate it if someone could check it out if they are > >> interested in a small, nifty, KDE4 browser. > >> > >> Fedora 11: > >> > http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F11/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm > >> > >> Rawhide: > >> > http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F12/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc12.i586.rpm > >> > >> Everything (spec / sources / rpms): > >> http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/ > >> > >> > > > > Unfortunately I will not have the time to review. However, I have just > > rebuilt the package of f11 x86_64. For an alpha version it certainly is > > promising, but there are still an awful lot of rough spots. > > > > The effort is very much appreciated > > > > Eli > > Thanks for having a look at it. The fact that it looks promising drew my > attention too. As far as I know some of the issues have been polished > already and a new version might be released soon. 0.1.2 is in the current > development GIT repository. > > <shameless ad> The review request is now up at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 </shameless ad> > > Looking forward to seeing it. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
