On Monday 15 June 2009 15:09:10 Eelko Berkenpies wrote: > > On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:48:14 -0400, Ben Boeckel <MathStuf at gmail.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Eelko Berkenpies wrote: > > > >> There is being worked on one; http://rekonq.sourceforge.net/ > >> > >> I don't know if it will be a default browser but it makes an > > good > >> alternative for Konqueror anyway. :) > >> > >> I'm working on getting it properly packaged for Fedora. I got > > an older > >> package wrapped up here: http://berkenpies.nl/rekonq/ (spec > > needs work for > >> the new version, 0.1.0, and I have to make sure I got > > everything covered > >> for review). The plan is to get it in to review before the > > end of next > >> week. > > We'll see how it goes. I'm not holding by breath for these > > Konqueror replacements. The project making the KPart to get > > WebKit integration is the one that, IMO, is Doing It Right > > instead of making a new browser from scratch. > > > > - --Ben > > Alright, I managed to wrap things up (a bit later as expected though). But > hey, better late then never they say. :) > > I've packaged rekonq 0.1.0 for F11 and F12/rawhide. It should pretty much > comply with the Package Guidelines and I'll submit it for review later. > Although I'd appreciate it if someone could check it out if they are > interested in a small, nifty, KDE4 browser. > > Fedora 11: > http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F11/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm > > Rawhide: > http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F12/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc12.i586.rpm > > Everything (spec / sources / rpms): > http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/ > > Unfortunately I will not have the time to review. However, I have just rebuilt the package of f11 x86_64. For an alpha version it certainly is promising, but there are still an awful lot of rough spots. The effort is very much appreciated Eli -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
