On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:07:56 +0300, Eli Wapniarski <eli at orbsky.homelinux.org> wrote: > On Monday 15 June 2009 15:09:10 Eelko Berkenpies wrote: >> >> On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:48:14 -0400, Ben Boeckel <MathStuf at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > Eelko Berkenpies wrote: >> > >> >> There is being worked on one; http://rekonq.sourceforge.net/ >> >> >> >> I don't know if it will be a default browser but it makes an >> > good >> >> alternative for Konqueror anyway. :) >> >> >> >> I'm working on getting it properly packaged for Fedora. I got >> > an older >> >> package wrapped up here: http://berkenpies.nl/rekonq/ (spec >> > needs work for >> >> the new version, 0.1.0, and I have to make sure I got >> > everything covered >> >> for review). The plan is to get it in to review before the >> > end of next >> >> week. >> > We'll see how it goes. I'm not holding by breath for these >> > Konqueror replacements. The project making the KPart to get >> > WebKit integration is the one that, IMO, is Doing It Right >> > instead of making a new browser from scratch. >> > >> > - --Ben >> >> Alright, I managed to wrap things up (a bit later as expected though). >> But >> hey, better late then never they say. :) >> >> I've packaged rekonq 0.1.0 for F11 and F12/rawhide. It should pretty much >> comply with the Package Guidelines and I'll submit it for review later. >> Although I'd appreciate it if someone could check it out if they are >> interested in a small, nifty, KDE4 browser. >> >> Fedora 11: >> http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F11/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm >> >> Rawhide: >> http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F12/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc12.i586.rpm >> >> Everything (spec / sources / rpms): >> http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/ >> >> > > Unfortunately I will not have the time to review. However, I have just > rebuilt the package of f11 x86_64. For an alpha version it certainly is > promising, but there are still an awful lot of rough spots. > > The effort is very much appreciated > > Eli Thanks for having a look at it. The fact that it looks promising drew my attention too. As far as I know some of the issues have been polished already and a new version might be released soon. 0.1.2 is in the current development GIT repository. <shameless ad> The review request is now up at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 </shameless ad> -- Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards, Eelko Berkenpies
